1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1992 Volvo 240
To start off, 1992 Volvo 240 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 240 (96 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 240 weights approximately 106 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Volvo 240 (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1992 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 1992 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | 240 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2660 mm |