1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Falcon weights approximately 325 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3150 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Bluebird | Falcon |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 221 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2800 mm |