1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2003 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2003 Smart ForTwo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Smart ForTwo (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 375 kg more than 2003 Smart ForTwo.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Smart ForTwo. (96 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2003 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Bluebird | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 1820 mm |
