1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (123 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 261 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo S40 (166 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Bluebird | S40 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2670 mm |
