1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2004 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Smart ForTwo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (59 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2004 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 385 kg more than 2004 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2004 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Nissan | Smart |
Model | Bluebird | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 40 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 1820 mm |