1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 100 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1980 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
Model | Bluebird | Polo |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2410 mm |