1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 248 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (381 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Bluebird | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 2922 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 268 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1438 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2720 mm |
