1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (208 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 905 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (340 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | XC90 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 208 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2860 mm |