1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Ascari KZ1
To start off, 2009 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP) has 441 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ascari KZ1 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Ascari KZ1 | |
| Make | Nissan | Ascari |
| Model | Bluebird | KZ1 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 4941 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 500 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 550 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1138 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2636 mm |
