1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Kia Forte
To start off, 2009 Kia Forte is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Forte (156 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Forte weights approximately 38 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Forte (195 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Kia Forte | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | Bluebird | Forte |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 156 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1228 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2649 mm |