1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Aston Martin Rapide
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin Rapide is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide (470 HP) has 411 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Aston Martin Rapide weights approximately 760 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide (600 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 484 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Aston Martin Rapide will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Aston Martin Rapide | |
| Make | Nissan | Aston Martin |
| Model | Bluebird | Rapide |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 470 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5019 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2141 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2990 mm |
