1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Bravo (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 166 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Nissan | Fiat |
Model | Bluebird | Bravo |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1356 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2610 mm |