1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo XC60 (217 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 731 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC60 (440 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | XC60 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2748 mm |