1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2012 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2012 Jeep Compass is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Compass (172 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Compass weights approximately 259 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Compass (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2012 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Nissan | Jeep |
| Model | Bluebird | Compass |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 172 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 223 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1449 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1814 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2634 mm |
