1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 214 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 773 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Bluebird | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 273 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2875 mm |