1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP) has 255 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 763 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Bluebird | CTS |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1951 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 314 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2880 mm |