1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford EDGE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford EDGE (281 HP) has 222 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford EDGE weights approximately 650 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford EDGE (343 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Ford EDGE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Bluebird | EDGE |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4679 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2223 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2824 mm |
