1980 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Smart Fortwo (71 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Smart Fortwo should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 350 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Nissan Bluebird | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Bluebird | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1951 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 71 HP |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 1867 mm |
