1980 Nissan Skyline vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Skyline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Skyline would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Skyline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Nissan Skyline (106 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Skyline should accelerate faster than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Skyline (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1980 Nissan Skyline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Nissan Skyline | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Nissan | Smart |
Model | Skyline | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1870 mm |