1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster
To start off, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster. (101 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster weights approximately 129 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster. (237 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1975 Plymouth Trail Duster | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Plymouth |
Model | Cutlass | Trail Duster |
Year Released | 1980 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4343 cc | 3678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1486 kg | 1615 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |