1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1977 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1977 Toyota Celica. (78 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1977 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 516 kg more than 1977 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Toyota Celica. (135 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1977 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
Model | Cutlass | Celica |
Year Released | 1980 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4343 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1486 kg | 970 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2430 mm |