1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1984 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1984 ZIL 4104 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 1855 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1984 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | ZIL |
| Model | Cutlass | 4104 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 7695 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 3335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 5750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3340 mm |
