1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1998 Renault Espider
To start off, 1998 Renault Espider is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Espider (191 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Espider should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Espider, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Espider. (277 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Espider.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1998 Renault Espider | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
| Model | Cutlass | Espider |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 4343 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 277 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
