1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2002 Volkswagen W12
To start off, 2002 Volkswagen W12 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,982 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen W12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 229 kg more than 2002 Volkswagen W12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2002 Volkswagen W12 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volkswagen |
Model | Cutlass | W12 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 5982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 600 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1251 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3010 mm |