1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2004 Toyota Will
To start off, 2004 Toyota Will is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Will (127 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Will should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 26 kg more than 2004 Toyota Will.
Because 2004 Toyota Will is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Will will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Will. (181 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Will.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2004 Toyota Will | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Cutlass | Will |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4343 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1486 kg | 1460 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2810 mm |
