1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2006 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 385 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2006 SsangYong Rexton has manual transmission. 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2006 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Oldsmobile | SsangYong |
Model | Cutlass | Rexton |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |