1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XK weights approximately 273 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Jaguar |
Model | Cutlass | XK |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1753 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4793 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1321 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2751 mm |