1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Volkswagen Sharan
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Sharan is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Sharan weights approximately 310 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Sharan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Volkswagen Sharan | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volkswagen |
Model | Cutlass | Sharan |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 1973 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1904 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2919 mm |