1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 16 kg more than 2012 Audi TT.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (349 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 Audi TT | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Audi |
| Model | Cutlass | TT |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4343 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 349 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1486 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2469 mm |
