1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (340 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cutlass | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4343 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2852 mm |
