1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2012 GMC Yukon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1186 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Oldsmobile | GMC |
Model | Cutlass | Yukon |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 332 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2946 mm |