1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2013 Audi A3
To start off, 2013 Audi A3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 26 kg more than 2013 Audi A3.
Because 2013 Audi A3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Audi A3. (281 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2013 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Audi |
| Model | Cutlass | A3 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4343 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1486 kg | 1460 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2578 mm |
