1980 Opel Ascona vs. 1962 Peugeot 403
To start off, 1980 Opel Ascona is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Peugeot 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Peugeot 403 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Opel Ascona (57 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1962 Peugeot 403. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1962 Peugeot 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Peugeot 403 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1980 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Opel Ascona | 1962 Peugeot 403 | |
Make | Opel | Peugeot |
Model | Ascona | 403 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |