1980 Opel Ascona vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 460 kg more than 1980 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Opel Ascona | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Ascona | Clio |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2480 mm |