1980 Opel Ascona vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1980 Opel Ascona. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1980 Opel Ascona.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Opel Ascona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Opel Ascona. (110 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Opel Ascona | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Opel | Citroen |
Model | Ascona | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.6 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |