1980 Opel Kadett vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 1980 Opel Kadett is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 427 kg more than 1980 Opel Kadett.
Because 1963 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Opel Kadett | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Opel | Rover |
Model | Kadett | 2000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2630 mm |