1980 Opel Kadett vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1980 Opel Kadett is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 355 kg more than 1980 Opel Kadett.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Opel Kadett | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Opel | Sunbeam |
Model | Kadett | Tiger |
Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2190 mm |