1980 Plymouth Reliant vs. 1977 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1980 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 60 kg more than 1977 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1977 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Plymouth Reliant | 1977 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Plymouth | Mazda |
| Model | Reliant | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2520 mm |
