1980 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 365 kg more than 1980 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Plymouth Reliant | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Plymouth | Subaru |
| Model | Reliant | Outback |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2455 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2660 mm |
