1980 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2006 Koenigsegg CCR
To start off, 2006 Koenigsegg CCR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Koenigsegg CCR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Koenigsegg CCR weights approximately 30 kg more than 1980 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2006 Koenigsegg CCR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Koenigsegg CCR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Plymouth Reliant | 2006 Koenigsegg CCR | |
Make | Plymouth | Koenigsegg |
Model | Reliant | CCR |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 816 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4191 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1989 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2659 mm |