1980 Reliant Kitten vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2005 Smart Coupe is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Reliant Kitten. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Reliant Kitten would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Reliant Kitten is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Smart Coupe (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1980 Reliant Kitten. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Smart Coupe should accelerate faster than 1980 Reliant Kitten. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Smart Coupe weights approximately 195 kg more than 1980 Reliant Kitten. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Smart Coupe (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Reliant Kitten. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Smart Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Reliant Kitten. 2005 Smart Coupe has automatic transmission and 1980 Reliant Kitten has manual transmission. 1980 Reliant Kitten will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Smart Coupe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Reliant Kitten | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
Make | Reliant | Smart |
Model | Kitten | Coupe |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 535 kg | 730 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2150 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 33 L |