1980 Reliant Kitten vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Reliant Kitten. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Reliant Kitten would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1980 Reliant Kitten. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1980 Reliant Kitten. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1980 Reliant Kitten. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Reliant Kitten is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Reliant Kitten. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Reliant Kitten. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Reliant Kitten.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Reliant Kitten | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Reliant | Ford |
Model | Kitten | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 12.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 535 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2150 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 51 L |