1980 Reliant SE6 vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Reliant SE6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Reliant SE6 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Reliant SE6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 470 kg more than 1980 Reliant SE6.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Reliant SE6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1980 Reliant SE6 has manual transmission. 1980 Reliant SE6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Reliant SE6 | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Reliant | Ford |
| Model | SE6 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2994 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3010 mm |
