1980 Renault 14 vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 14 would be higher. At 2,982 cc, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1980 Renault 14. (58 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1980 Renault 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 79 kg more than 1980 Renault 14. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Renault 14. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (280 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Renault 14. (92 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Renault 14.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Renault 14 | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 14 | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1218 cc | 2982 cc |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 944 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 87 L |