1980 Renault 18 vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 18 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Renault 18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Renault 18 (63 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Renault 18 should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Renault 18 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Renault 18 (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Renault 18 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Renault 18 | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Renault | Tata |
Model | 18 | Nano |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 37 L |