1980 Renault 4 vs. 1983 Volvo 760

To start off, 1983 Volvo 760 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 760 (156 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1980 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 1980 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 760 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1980 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Volvo 760 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 760. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Volvo 760 (234 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Renault 4. (62 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Volvo 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Renault 4.

Compare all specifications: