1980 Renault 4 vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1980 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1980 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 2 (136 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Renault 4. (62 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Renault 4.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Renault 4 | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | 4 | 2 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 955 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 62 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 695 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |