1980 Renault Rodeo vs. 1963 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1980 Renault Rodeo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph Vitesse weights approximately 200 kg more than 1980 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1963 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Renault Rodeo | 1963 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | Rodeo | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 845 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2270 mm |