1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 56 kg more than 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Jeep |
| Model | Corniche | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 459 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2280 kg | 2336 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2156 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2916 mm |
