1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 26 kg more than 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
Model | Corniche | Tundra |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2280 kg | 2306 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3700 mm |